Tuesday, May 25, 2010

13 forces that shape What People Buy. Successful Salespeople Guide to Managing Customer Expectations.

What and How People Buy

Economists have a different definition of profit than accountants, because they consider both parties to a transaction. Adam Smith made the observation that a transaction between two parties will only take place to the extent that both parties benefit, by receiving more in value than they are giving up. U.S. Congressman Samuel Barrett Pettengill [1866–1974] gave the following excellent definition of profit from an economist’s perspective:
The successful producer of an article sells it for more than it costs him to make, and that’s his profit. But the customer buys it only because it’s worth more to her than she pays for it, and that’s her profit. No one can long make a profit producing anything unless the customer makes a profit using it.
Stanley Marcus [1905–2002], one of the sons of the founders of Neiman-Marcus, put it even more explicitly:
You’re really not in business to make a profit, but you’re in business to render a service that is so good people are willing to pay a profit in recognition of what you’re doing for them.
This is the ultimate principle for any business because it places the focus where it belongs, on the customer.

It is a deceptively simple question: What are we getting paid for? Yet many businesses arrogantly assume they know what their customers want and believe they have been giving them exactly that for years. This is a myopic vision, and potentially harmful, because there now exists a plethora of information available on why people buy, how they buy, and the decision process they go through, which businesses ignore at their peril. Economist Shlomo Maital, who has been teaching economics to business executives for decades, has put forth 13 forces that shape what people buy, in his book Executive Economics:

A aptness
B bandwagons and bubbles
C cost, or price
D demographics
E elasticity, or sensitivity to price
F fashion and fads
G greed
H habit
I income
J jazz
K knowledge
L loyalty
M minds and money (From Maital, 1994: 171)

Some of the above factors explain why jewelers have long understood that people do not buy diamonds for the four C’s inherent in them: color, cut, clarity, and carat weight. They implicitly understand what people are really buying is the reaction of others––the man pictures the reaction of the woman he loves while she imagines the reaction of her family, friends, co-workers, and so on. They also explain why movie attendance and book sales are dramatically affected by word of mouth––the so-called bandwagon effect.

Many theories attempt to explain why people buy what they do. Economist Thorstein Bunde Veblen [1857–1929] posited many theories in his book The Theory of the Leisure Class (first published in 1899), which Maital has drawn upon for some of the above motivations of why people buy. Veblen referred to a “barbarian culture,” citing that trophies such as property or slaves were signs of successful aggression. In today’s culture, luxuries are the major signal of status and class, which Veblen reasoned were purchased for two reasons: to show others you are a member of the class above and to distinguish yourself from those below. Economists of the day did not take Veblen’s book seriously, finding it obtuse and unsupported by any evidence. One Chicago economist said, “I congratulated him and asked if he had thought of having it translated into English.”

A better theory is posited by Michael LeBoeuf, Ph.D., in his book How to Win Customers and Keep Them for Life: Revised and Updated for the Digital Age. He suggests that customers have the following motivations for these various purchases:
    Don’t sell me clothes. Sell me a sharp appearance style, and attractiveness.
    Don’t sell me insurance. Sell me peace of mind and a great future for my family and me.
    Don’t sell me a house. Sell me comfort, contentment, a good investment, and pride of ownership [and a piece of the American Dream].
    Don’t sell me books. Sell me pleasant hours and the profits of knowledge.
    Don’t sell me toys. Sell my children happy moments.
    Don’t sell me a computer. Sell me the pleasure and profits of the miracles of modern technology.
    Don’t sell me tires. Sell me freedom from worry and low cost per mile.
    Don’t sell me airline tickets. Sell me a fast, safe, on-time arrival at my destination feeling like a million dollars.
    Don’t sell me things. Sell me ideals, feelings, self-respect, home life, and happiness (LeBoeuf, 2000: 22–23).

Successful salespeople do not necessarily ignore features in the products they are selling, but they almost always add “which means” to the end of every explanation of their product or service offering. For example, “This car has a V-8 engine, which means it will last longer because it doesn’t have to work as hard as a smaller engine” (Williams, 1998: 98).

Advertising giant Leo Burnett used to say, “Don’t tell me how good you make it; tell me how good it makes me when I use it.”Despite all of the untold millions of products and services for sale in today’s marketplace, customers will exchange their hard-earned money for only two things:
    Good feelings
    Solutions to problems (LeBoeuf, 2000: 23).

Focusing on the total customer experience––solving the problem and creating the good feelings––demonstrates not just competency, but distinction. But the utilitarian view posited by LeBoeuf does not help a firm custom tailor its service offering to its various customers. It is easy to get caught up in hairy hypotheses that are long and complicated, but I prefer to shave with Occam’s razor––a medieval philosophical concept that states it serves no purpose to achieve a result with many assumptions rather than with a few. Which is why I prefer Theodore Levitt’s theory of what customers really buy: expectations. Levitt was a marketing professor at Harvard Business School, and once the editor of Harvard Business Review.

His expectations theory is useful because it forces the company to focus on the utility the customer is trying to maximize. By ascertaining customer expectations, the company has the ability to manage––to a certain degree––those expectations.

Southwest Airlines is a master at managing customer expectations. Customers understand very well that it is a no-frills airline, with no assigned seats (although this is expected to change), no food, no first class, and so on. However, since they have lowered customers expectations in these areas, when they crack irreverent jokes, achieve a stellar on-time arrival record, and do not lose your luggage, all at a price comparable to driving yourself or taking the bus, most customers walk away with their expectations exceeded––and, more importantly, they come back to fly Southwest again. Compare these expectations to buying a first-class ticket on, say, United Airlines. The customer’s expectations of every aspect of the flight are totally different.

Because expectations are dynamic, not static, it is also imperative to continuously ask customers what they expect. A company should never rest on its laurels and assume it knows exactly what the customer is up to.

Continuous learning from customers is an ongoing process and requires many different listening posts to accomplish. It is not enough to send out periodic Internet “how are we doing” customer satisfaction surveys. Most people do not fill these out, limiting their response and usefulness right from the start. Furthermore, most of the questions are biased and may not deal with the issues the customer is concerned about. Not many customers are very excited to fill these out, because they tend not to spend their waking hours cogitating on how the businesses they patronize can provide more value. After all, it is not the customer’s job to be innovative. Marriott has learned to engage customers in dialogues at many different levels,
often surveying their business customers on the concierge level during cocktail hour through informal chats. The data may not be as scientific and precise, but there is no doubt to Marriott that the information conveyed is much more relevant to customers’ true concerns and experiences. When one Chicago Marriott had budgeted $20,000 in order to upgrade the black and white TV sets to color in the bathrooms located on the concierge level, based on actual conversations with engineering and concierge-level team members, they learned that not many people requested the upgrade. What they did want, based on insistent requests from guests, was irons and ironing boards.

Focusing on the customer’s individual expectations forces the firm to individualize its service delivery to that particular customer’s wants and needs. No two customers should be treated equally. Customers want to be treated individually, or better yet, specially. This is inherently easier to accomplish in service organizations than in manufacturing, although with the recent trend toward “mass customization” of everything from Levi Jeans and baby dolls, to bicycles and children’s books, this is changing.

There is another major lesson with respect to customer expectations. Businesses compete against any organization that has the ability to raise customer expectations. FedEx brought a new standard to the passenger airline business with respect to handling and tracking luggage, just as anyone who visits Disneyland or Walt Disney World has their expectations raised when it comes to customer service. Once people experience premium service, they want more of it and are less and less tolerant of those organizations that do not deliver on the promise. This expectation dynamism, though, requires that leaders constantly look beyond their own four walls to learn from other industries.


Saturday, May 15, 2010

Forex Trading Insight. Using Gold to Identify Currency Leaders and Laggards.

Assessing the performance of currencies against the value of gold enables a transparent examination of the strength of a nation's currency, without the influence of dynamics in other currencies and their economies. A rising euro against the U.S. dollar, for instance, may not necessarily be a reflection of improved fundamentals in the Eurozone but of deteriorating fundamentals, technicals, and/or sentiment in the U.S. dollar. Meanwhile, the euro could be selling off against the Japanese yen and be little changed against the British pound—a different performance from that against the dollar. Charting the euro against gold would allow for a secular view of the euro, which is not influenced by factors specific to individual currencies. Unlike currencies, which are largely influenced by interest rate movements resulting from economic policies and capital flows, gold is mainly a reflection of supply and demand, and not a direct result of any particular central bank actions.
Charting several currencies against the price of gold presents a broader view of currencies against a neutral asset such as gold, enabling a less biased look at the currency in question. There are percentage increase in the value of gold against the aussie (Australian dollar, AUD), loonie (Canadian dollar, CAD), euro (EUR), and kiwi (New Zealand dollar, NZD) from January 2001 to May 2008. All charts show an uptrend, reflecting gold's appreciation against all currencies since 2001. The graph with the least appreciation throughout most of the eight-year period is against the loonie, showing that gold grew the least against the Canadian currency. Nonetheless, at the end of the period, gold ended up 90.5 percent against the aussie versus 123 percent against the loonie, meaning gold's appreciation was the least against the Australian dollar. This suggests that the Aussie was the best-performing currency in the group. The weaker increase in gold against the AUD, CAD, and NZD reflected the broad rally in those currencies due to their dependence on rising commodities as well as high interest rates prevailing throughout the period.
Similarly, we measures gold against the U.S. dollar, Swiss franc (CHF), Japanese yen (JPY), and British pound (GBP) over the same period. Note how gold's performance against these currencies was mostly higher than its performance January 2001 to May 2008, suggesting these currencies have underperformed the AUD, CAD, EUR, and NZD. Thus, with gold showing the highest percentage increase against the USD and the lowest percentage increase against the AUD, we can conclude that playing the AUD/USD currency pair (buying AUD and selling USD) would have produced the highest rate of return if held between January 2001 and May 2008. Indeed, opportunities in foreign exchange markets are not limited solely to trading currencies against the USD, but also in those pairs involving non-USD currencies. Charting gold against different currencies over a three- or six-month period enables a truer assessment of individual currencies than comparing them against the dollar or the euro. This way, traders can not only determine the secular performance of currencies but may also rank them in order of strength and be better able to buy the strongest against the weakest.


Wednesday, May 12, 2010

New Online Local Directory

Searching for local business information in your city can be faster and easier with the help of online directory, like Yellow Pages. Alternatively, you can benefit from other online local directory, like JustClickLocal. The JustClickLocal is the place to go when looking for local information in major US cities: whether buying a new car, booking airline ticket, checking local hardware stores, repairing your air conditioner, shopping for life insurance, finding medical doctors, joining aerobics classes, finding fine french restaurants, and many more.

This new business directory and local directory is packed with hundreds of categories: from auto, B2B, Dining & Entertainment, Dieting & Fitness, Medical Doctors & Procedures, Professional Services, Real Estate & Home Services, Schools & Education, Shopping, and Travel & Transportation.

They provide access to classified business information (business addresses, phone numbers, maps), but it lacks of other information like business websites and driving directions. I found their search engine is quite fast and useful. The only drawback is little business listings available. For example, searching for Dallas Pawn Shops in Dallas, TX just gives me 10 listings. Searching for Houston Pawn Shops also showed 10 listings. Initially, I was expecting at least 40 listings from their search result. But in future, they will definitely attract more business listings on their directory. So, discover local information in major US cities with JustClickLocal.


Friday, May 7, 2010

April 2010 - Top 10 Entrecard Droppers

I like to thank to all droppers for their continued support.
My special appreciation for the following Top 10 Droppers for April 2010:

A Simple Life

my kids are my world

Electricians notes

Winesworld's blog

Confessions of a Fitness Diva

Life's sweets and spices

T-Shirt Reviews

Michelle's Menagerie

Mutual Love

Art Shout!

Please visit these great sites.


Sunday, May 2, 2010

Amazing Facts of Human Behavior - What influence People’s Opinions, Thoughts, and Desires

Think about These Amazing Facts of Human Behavior
70 percent of Americans once gave an opinion in a nationwide opinion poll about an act that didn’t exist. Some felt the states should take care of the responsibility, some felt the government should. (People have an opinion on things that don’t even exist! )
40+ percent of Americans chose the last option of three when asked what their opinion was on how easy getting a divorce should be in the USA. This was true regardless of which option was offered last. (People pick the last choice . . . remember this! )
Sales of jams in a store increased by 10 times when people could sample up to six jams vs. those days when the store offered 20 options. (More choices increase sampling . . . not sales! )
College students report cheating to be wrong in what appear to be anonymous forms. Given the opportunity, even those students reporting strong attitudes against cheating on exams immediately cheat when given the opportunity. (What people say and what they do are two very different things! )
When pollsters ask people what is the most important issue facing the nation people respond with hundreds of different answers that are completely different and in greatly differing percentages when pollsters ask people to choose from a list of options which is the most important issue facing the nation. (People don’t tell you what they think; they select options from those you give them! )
When people are asked about such hot topics as nuclear weapons they will respond with opposite opinions depending on how the question is phrased. (Framing is the ball game! )

From these and dozens of other valid and reliable studies we conclude that:
1.    People’s opinions, thoughts, and desires are often molded by the questions they are asked.
2.    People’s thoughts, opinions, and desires are often created in the moment and have little or no relationship with what they will actually do or what they will believe later.
3.    Many people have beliefs about things that are not real, based upon questions about things like nonexistent Acts of Congress and not knowledge.

Key 1: Most people are fairly automatic in their behavior. They see a commercial and because they believe what they see without critical thought, decide what drink to drink, restaurant to eat at, or tax preparer to use, all based upon suggestion.
Key 2: Once most people choose something, write something down, say something, whether it makes any sense or not, whether it is in their best interest or not, they tend to stick with that decision, regardless of how that decision was made.
Key 3: People don’t like cognitive dissonance. Most can’t hold two opposing thoughts in their minds so they simply pick the thought/decision/belief they currently hold and eliminate the rest without further consideration. This is called the law of consistency.

The Law of Consistency states that, “When an individual announces in writing (or verbally to a lesser degree) that he is taking a position on any issue or point of view, he will strongly tend to defend that belief regardless of its accuracy even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. “
Your clients’ past decisions and public proclamations dramatically influence their beliefs and attitudes. Once a person has publicly said, “I’ll never X, “ they normally never do. Many people make public statements that they have not thought out, that often turn into beliefs and permanent attitudes. The reason is simple. We are taught that our word is our bond. When we say something you can count on us.


Recent Posts

Make Money Profit

Smart Money Success. Financial Success. Business Success.

Online Success Center. Professional Resources for Online Success.

Yahoo MyWebLog Recent Viewers

Business & Life Success Resources Centre

Support Us

1. Rate Me 5 STARS-->

2. Favourite my Blog --> Add to 

Technorati Favorites
3. Vote me --> Top Blogs
4. Vote me -->Blogroll.net
5. Just Click this one only--> the best
6. Just Click this one only --> Blog Directory
7. Click "HOME" -->
8. Rate me --> blog search 

9. Rate Me --> Rate My Blog

Verified Blog

Total Pageviews


Learning Corner.Engineering Books.Management EBooks.Business Books.Computer Book.Discount Bookstore. Copyright 2008 All Rights Reserved Revolution Two Church theme